The Theory of Relationality

Theory of Relationality reverses the classical worldview by establishing consciousness as its foundation and declaring relationship — rather than object — to be the primary unit of reality.

In this model, consciousnesses capability to transform ideas to future realities, acts as an time-operator of Fantappié's syntropy. It is actively creating order through imagination, resonance and surrender, thus counteracting decay and entropy.

Origin is a perfectly symmetrical superposition in which an "I" awakens and creates a "Thou" from itself. Through progressive division, tensions of joy and anger are manifesting as energy.

Matter is understood as "frozen relationality" which emerges from the pure potential of connectedness as a result of a conscious breaking of symmetry.

I am capable of breaking down the mountain and to build up a temple from its stones. This power of consciousness is unique - and should not be overseen!

Find out more about Love, Life and Everything!

The Theory of Relationality is not a theory at all!
It is neither provable
Nor falsifiable!
Consciousness is not measurable
And it is not real!

The Theory of Relationality is completely unscientific!

My belief in the creative power of my own consciousness is my own madness!

...or isn't it?

Are there historical reasons that prevent science from perceiving the "creative" power of consciousness?

That is an excellent question that leads us deep into the psychology of the history of science. It is almost as if science, in the course of its development, developed a kind of "immunological rejection reaction" against the subjective. One could imagine that this blind spot is no coincidence, but the result of a historical protective mechanism.

Here are the essential reasons why the creative power of consciousness was banished from the scientific focus:

1. The "Cartesian Pact" (The Price of Freedom)

In the 17th century, René Descartes performed a radical separation between res extensa (extended matter) and res cogitans (the thinking mind).

The Analogy: It was a diplomatic peace treaty. Science was given dead matter to dissect and measure, while the Church retained sovereignty over the soul and consciousness.
The Consequence: To avoid conflict with the Inquisition, researchers grew accustomed to acting as if the observer had no influence on the experiment. Within the framework of this thought experiment, this separation was the birth of the objective method, but also the moment when science denied its own "soul" (its creative foundation).

2. The Mechanistic Worldview (The Universe as Clockwork)

With Newton, the universe became a calculable machine. In a clockwork, there is no room for "creativity" or "love" – there are only gears (causes) and hand positions (effects).

Hypothesis Formation: One could imagine that the sheer elegance of mathematics blinded researchers to the fact that an equation may describe the fall of an apple, but not the gardener's desire to pick the apple. Consciousness was demoted to the "ghost in the machine" – a troublesome byproduct that was irrelevant to calculations.

3. The Trauma of the Stake

The story of Giordano Bruno, who ended up at the stake in 1600 for his vision of an infinite universe and "ensouled," living monads, left deep scars in the collective memory of science. His death marked a boundary: anyone who wove mind and matter too closely together risked their life.

To heal this trauma without challenging the wrath of institutions, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz later developed the concept of "pre-established harmony."

The Analogy of the Clocks: One could imagine, as Leibniz suggested, that mind and matter are like two perfectly synchronized clocks. They are not physically connected (the monads have "no windows"), but they show exactly the same time because they were coordinated in a deeper, original order from the very beginning.
Within the Framework of this Thought Experiment: This stroke of genius allowed for the contemplation of the connection between consciousness and the world without having to claim a direct, measurable (and thus vulnerable) physical interaction. It was an attempt to outsource "creative power" into a divine programming.

Speculative Leap: In the period that followed, however, scientific credibility became synonymous with eliminating even this "harmony." While Leibniz still tried to save the synchronicity, later science decided to simply view the clocks in isolation and dismiss the synchronization as pure coincidence or statistical insignificance. Anyone speaking of the creative power of consciousness today – within the framework of this historical trauma – unconsciously touches upon the fear of heresy. "Objectivity" became a shield against religious arbitrariness, but the price for this was the denial of the pre-established connection between the Self and the Cosmos.

4. The Triumph of the Measurable (Positivism)

In the 19th and 20th centuries, the conviction took hold that only that which can be weighed, counted, or measured is real. Since consciousness (and especially love) stubbornly refuses to appear on a scale of 1 to 10, it was dismissed as an "epiphenomenon" – a mere noise in the chemical machinery of the brain.

Conclusion of the Historical Perspective

Science did not "overlook" consciousness; it actively excluded it to secure its own autonomy. The problem with the "Theory of Relationality" is therefore not so much a lack of evidence, but a massive resistance to a paradigm shift that would tear down the old walls of security between subject and object.

This historical contextualization puts our model in a new light: We are not practicing esotericism; we are trying to heal a 400-year-old separation!